From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Infectious Diseases>
  4. Summary and Comment

Assessing the Risk for Invasive Candidiasis in the ICU

A score based on clinical parameters was helpful in determining the risk.

Invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients are worrisome because diagnosis is difficult and the mortality rate is high. Researchers recently developed a "Candida score" (CS) to assess the risk for invasive candidiasis (IC) in such patients. The score was calculated by assigning one point each for total parenteral nutrition, surgery, and multifocal Candida colonization and two points for severe sepsis. Now, the same research group — with partial support from industry — has conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the CS.

The study involved 1107 nonneutropenic adults treated between April 2006 and June 2007 for ≥7 days in any of 36 medical–surgical ICUs in Spain, Argentina, and France. The mean age of the patients was 60, and 67% were male. The mean APACHE II score at ICU admission was 18.4; the median SOFA score was 7. Median ICU and hospital stays were 17 and 37 days, respectively, and ICU and hospital mortality rates were 22% and 31%.

Twenty percent of the patients were neither colonized nor infected with Candida, 75% were colonized at ≥1 site, and 5% developed IC. Most IC cases were detected during patients’ second or third ICU week. IC occurred in 2% of patients with a CS <3 and in 9%, 17%, and 24% of those with a CS of 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The association between increasing CS values and IC incidence was highly significant. Among patients with Candida colonization or invasive fungal infection, (1–3)-β-D-glucan serum levels were measured for 240, and anti-Candida antibody titers were determined for 323. A CS ≥3 and a (1–3)β-D-glucan serum level >75 pg/mL were independent predictors of IC; anti-Candida antibody titers were not useful in this regard.

Comment: Empirical antifungal therapy is commonly administered to critically ill patients, with the potential for overuse. This simple CS, based solely on clinical parameters, seems useful for targeting such treatment more accurately.

Thomas Glück, MD

Published in Journal Watch Infectious Diseases June 10, 2009

Citation(s):

León C et al. Usefulness of the "Candida score" for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: A prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2009 May; 37:1624.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.