Surgical Masks or N95 Respirators for the Flu?

Home>
Specialties>
Infectious Diseases>
Summary and Comment

Surgical Masks or N95 Respirators for the Flu?

In a randomized trial, surgical masks and N95 respirators provided healthcare workers with comparable protection against influenza.

How best to protect healthcare workers against influenza remains unresolved. During the 2008–2009 winter influenza season, investigators compared surgical masks with fit-tested N95 respirators in a randomized trial involving eight Ontario, Canada, tertiary care hospitals.

Participants were 446 nurses who provided care to patients with febrile respiratory illness while working in emergency departments or inpatient medical or pediatric units. Follow-up (including twice-weekly assessment for signs and symptoms of influenza, and laboratory testing of nasal specimens from participants with influenza-like illness) lasted from January 12 through April 23, 2009. Influenza-vaccination status was comparable between the nurses using surgical masks and those using N95 respirators (30.2% and 28.1%, respectively), as were rates of exposure to spouses/roommates (22.4% and 25.9%) or children (22.6% and 20.5%) with influenza-like illness.

The incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza was similar between groups (23.6% and 22.9%). In addition, no significant between-group differences were noted in the incidence of influenza-like illness or infections with respiratory syncytial virus, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses, rhinovirus-enterovirus, or coronaviruses.

Comment: That protection against multiple respiratory viruses was comparable between surgical masks and fit-tested N95 respirators is reassuring, given the far greater costs and logistical issues associated with N95 respirators. This study shows the distressingly low acceptance of influenza vaccination by healthcare workers and acknowledges the reality of exposure to influenza outside the workplace.

— Richard T. Ellison III, MD

Published in Journal Watch Infectious Diseases October 21, 2009

Citation(s):

Loeb M et al. Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: A randomized trial. JAMA 2009 Oct 1; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1466)

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Surgical masks vs N95
Marysia Meylan, self employed Epidemiologist, 22 Oct 2009 3:08 PM EST
Medscape reported another study on the same subject recently: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/709003?sssdmh=dm1.530110&src=nldne&uac=118273EK
Masks for flu protection
Jo Deverill, 2 Nov 2009 1:58 PM EST
Given that it is impossible to conduct a blinded RCT of masks vs no masks, there is in my opinion... [more]

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Remark subject:*

Your remark:*

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:
First & middle initial:*

Last:*

Email address (will not
be published):*

Professional specialty:*

Place of work (optional):

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

No competing interests

Or, the following competing interests (for example, financial stakes or professional relationships):

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.