From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Infectious Diseases>
  4. Summary and Comment

HPV Vaccine Not Effective Therapeutically

A randomized clinical trial has shown that a bivalent HPV vaccine does not affect the clearance of preexisting infection.

Although vaccines are valued primarily for their protective ability, some of them may also enhance the body’s immune response to a preexisting infection. Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18, although usually spontaneously cleared, can lead to cervical cancer if persistent. Could an HPV-16/18 vaccine provide adequate immune stimulation to accelerate clearance of an HPV-16 or HPV-18 infection? Investigators addressed this question as part of a larger, ongoing, community-based, randomized trial of a bivalent HPV-16/18 viruslike particle vaccine, conducted in Costa Rica. (Two of the investigators are named inventors on HPV vaccine patents; a third is employed by the manufacturer of the vaccine involved in this trial.)

Recruited between June 2004 and December 2005, the 2189 participants (healthy women aged 18–25) were randomized to receive three doses of either the bivalent HPV vaccine or hepatitis A vaccine. All were positive for HPV DNA at enrollment, had ≥6 months of follow-up, and had follow-up HPV DNA results.

Among the women with HPV-16, HPV-18, or combined HPV-16/18 infection, HPV clearance rates at 6 months and 12 months were similar between the HPV vaccine group and the control group for each HPV type individually and for dual infection. Additionally, no significant differences were noted in relation to HPV-16/18 antibody titers or viral load, or for HPV types other than 16 or 18.

Comment: Although this study was done with the bivalent HPV-16/18 vaccine, the results probably would have been the same with the licensed quadrivalent HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine. These findings reinforce the concept that for maximum benefit, these vaccines should be administered to adolescent girls before their sexual debut.

Richard T. Ellison III, MD

Published in Journal Watch Infectious Diseases September 5, 2007

Citation(s):

Hildesheim A et al. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: A randomized trial. JAMA 2007 Aug 15; 298:743-53.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.