From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Infectious Diseases>
  4. Summary and Comment

New Insights into the Epidemiology of Endocarditis

Two rigorously performed studies provide differing perspectives on the epidemiology of endocarditis.

The past 40 years have seen major changes in the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of infective endocarditis in the developed world. However, a detailed analysis of these changes has been lacking. Two new studies afford a better understanding of the trends in infective endocarditis overall and Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in particular.

Tleyjeh and colleagues reviewed all 107 cases of infective endocarditis that occurred in the relatively isolated community of Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1970 through 2000. Patients were 18.8 to 90.6 years old (mean, 61.5 years); 73% were male; only 3% were injection-drug users. During these 30 years, the age-adjusted incidence varied between 5.0 and 7.0 cases per 100,000 person-years. The proportion of cases involving aortic valves or occurring in patients with past rheumatic fever trended downward, whereas the proportion occurring in patients with mitral valve prolapse or prosthetic valves increased. The principal causative organisms were viridans group streptococci (44%) and S. aureus (26%); no significant variation over time was noted.

Fowler and colleagues undertook a prospective analysis of S. aureus endocarditis cases seen at 39 medical centers in 16 countries from June 2000 through December 2003. Staphylococcus aureus was the pathogen identified most frequently (558 of 1779 cases; 31.4%). Clinical characteristics independently associated with S. aureus endocarditis (as compared with endocarditis due to other pathogens) were injection-drug use, symptoms for <1 month before presentation, healthcare-associated infection, persistent bacteremia, infection linked to an intravascular device, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Healthcare-associated infections represented 39% of S. aureus infections, with 60% of these acquired in a hospital and 40% in other settings. Compared to community-acquired S. aureus cases with (CA-IDU) or without (CA-nonIDU) injection-drug use, healthcare-associated cases were associated with higher inpatient mortality (29% vs. 11% [CA-IDU] vs. 21% [CA-nonIDU]), a higher rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections (49% vs. 10% vs. 13%), and a higher rate of mitral-valve infections (56% vs. 20% vs. 49%). Clinical features independently associated with MRSA infection were healthcare-associated infection, chronic immunosuppressive therapy, infection linked to an intravascular device, persistent bacteremia, and diabetes mellitus.

Comment: As noted by an editorialist, these two rigorously performed studies provide differing perspectives on endocarditis. Tleyjeh and coworkers’ study spanned 3 decades, investigated disease in a primarily middle-class population not involved with injection-drug use, and found relatively stable disease characteristics. In contrast, Fowler and colleagues focused on cases that occurred within the last 5 years and highlighted emerging issues including increasing rates of healthcare-associated infections and of MRSA infections.

— Richard T. Ellison III, MD

Published in Journal Watch Infectious Diseases July 22, 2005

Citation(s):

Tleyjeh IM et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. JAMA 2005 Jun 22/29; 293:3022-8.

Fowler VG Jr et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: A consequence of medical progress. JAMA 2005 Jun 22/29; 293:3012-21.

Quagliarello V. Infective endocarditis: Global, regional, and future perspectives. JAMA 2005 Jun 22/29; 293:3061-2.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2005. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.